Field Service Engineer & Audio Visual (AV) Technician
Old Mutual
Job Description
,
, - . No , no
, no CSS classes, no inline styles. Must preserve all original content word-for-word, not add, remove, summarize, or rephrase. Must use for section headers like Responsibilities, Qualifications, etc. The original uses tags and other markup. We need to convert to appropriate tags.
We must keep all content exactly as is, word-for-word. That includes the weird
Skills
etc. But we cannot use tags? The rule says use for section headers, and - for list items. It doesn't forbid inside paragraphs? It says use
for introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers, - for list items. It doesn't forbid inside paragraphs, but maybe we should keep the original formatting? The instruction: "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". That includes the tags? The original includes tags and other HTML. But the rule says use
for paragraphs and
for section headers. It doesn't say we cannot keep inside. However we might need to convert to something? The rule didn't forbid . It just says use for section headers. So we can keep inside paragraphs. But we must not add any new tags beyond allowed ones? It says no CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags. It doesn't forbid , , etc. So we can keep them.
We need to structure the HTML: Use for section headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also maybe "The Old Mutual Story!" etc.
We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That includes the stray
etc. We need to output only the cleaned HTML, no extra commentary.
We need to convert the given raw text into semantic HTML using allowed tags. Let's parse the content.
The raw text includes:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
To provide comprehensive end-user support ... (some paragraphs)
Key Responsibilities:
EUC Support:
- Provide first-line and second-line IT support to end-users
...
- Install, configure and maintain laptops, desktops and mobile devices
...
...
- Support live events, presentations, webinars and boardroom meetings
Audio Visual (AV) Support:
... items ...
Minimum Requirements:
...
Technical Skills:
...
Soft Skills:
...
Skills
Competencies
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively...
... many items ...
Education
Bachelor of Commerce (BCom): Information Technology (Required)
Closing Date
30 July 2026 , 23:59
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
We need to output only HTML using ,
, - . No , no
, no inline styles, no classes. But the original has many empty paragraphs. We can keep them as empty maybe? They are empty, but we can keep them as (still a paragraph). That's allowed.
We need to use for section headers. The original uses for headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities:", "EUC Support:", "Audio Visual (AV) Support:", "Minimum Requirements:", "Technical Skills:", "Soft Skills:", "Working Conditions:", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also there are tags in the "Competencies" list: they have empty. We need to preserve them? The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word. So we must keep those tags as they appear. But we are limited to using for section headers. However those are part of the content; we cannot remove them. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't forbid other heading tags, but we might need to keep them as they are. However the rule says "Use for section headers". It might be interpreted that we should use for those headers, not . But we must preserve original content word-for-word, which includes tags. If we replace them with , we would be altering content (changing tag). That would be removing or altering. So we must keep them as they are. But the rule also says "Use for section headers". Possibly we can wrap the header text inside but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
Job Description
etc. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". Those are sections, but the original doesn't have explicit headings with those words; they are bolded text within paragraphs. We could wrap the bolded text in tags? That would add tags not present originally, which would be adding content, violating preservation. So we must not add new tags. So we should keep the original markup as is, but we are only allowed to use
,
, - . However we can still use inside
. The rule didn't forbid . So we can keep tags. But we cannot use or inline styles. The original has many etc. Those have inline style attributes; we must remove them because we cannot have inline styles. So we need to strip style attributes. Also we need to remove class attributes. So we need to output
without style or class. Also remove etc? The rule says no CSS classes, no inline styles. So we can keep as long as it has no class? It has class="emphasis-2". That's a class, which is not allowed. So we must remove the class attribute. Also we must remove style attributes. So we need to output cleaned tags without attributes.
Thus we need to transform the raw HTML into a cleaned version using only allowed tags, but preserving content word-for-word (including the text inside tags). We can remove attributes but keep the inner text. That is allowed because we are not adding or removing words.
We must also preserve empty tags like , , . Those are empty; we can keep them.
We must not add any new text.
Thus the output will be a series of tags with the same inner text as original, but stripped of style and class attributes, and using only ,
, - . However we have
tags that are not allowed? The rule didn't forbid , but it said use for section headers. It didn't forbid other heading tags, but we might want to keep them as they appear. However the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading tags. It just suggests using for those sections. But we have no explicit section headers in the original; they are bolded. So we could just keep them as
...
. That would be okay.
But we need to use for section headers. Which sections are those? Possibly "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". These are section headers. The original uses around them, but we could wrap them in tags to satisfy the rule. However that would be adding tags around content that originally didn't have them, which is adding new markup, but not adding new text. The rule says "Use for section headers". It doesn't say we cannot wrap the existing bolded text in . That would be adding a tag but not altering text. Is that allowed? The rule says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. The instruction is about content, not markup? It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". That likely refers to the textual content, not the HTML tags. So we can add tags as needed, as long as we don't change the text. So we can wrap the bolded headings in tags. That would be adding ...
around the existing .... That would change the tag structure but not the text. Is that considered "adding"? It adds a tag, but not new text. The instruction might consider that as adding markup, which might be disallowed. However the rule explicitly says "Use for section headers". So we must use for those sections. Therefore we need to convert the headings to . The original headings are bolded text within
. We can replace the
...
with ...
(removing and maybe). But that would be removing tags and
tags, which is removing markup but not text. The instruction says "do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Removing tags might be considered removing markup, but not text. However it might be considered "removing" something from the content (the tags). But the instruction likely refers to content, not markup. It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". So we must keep the same words, but we can change tags? It's ambiguous. Safer approach: Keep the original tags exactly as they appear, but we need to use for section headers. The original doesn't have tags, but we can add them around the heading text, but that would be adding new tags, which might be considered adding content? The instruction says "do not add ... or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. I think it's permissible because the rule about using for section headers is explicit, so we must use for those headings. So we will wrap the heading text (the bolded text) in tags, and remove the surrounding
and maybe? But we must preserve the text word-for-word, which includes the bold markup? The bold markup is not visible text. The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word, not markup. So we can change tags as needed as long as the visible text remains same. So we can convert
Job Description
to Job Description
. That would preserve the text "Job Description". That seems okay.
Thus we will produce HTML where section headings are wrapped in . For list items, we will use - ...
. For other paragraphs, we will use
...
.
We must remove any style attributes and class attributes. Also remove any empty maybe keep as but we cannot use because it's forbidden. So we must remove tags entirely. The rule says no s. So we must not output tags. So we need to remove them, but we must preserve the content inside them (which is empty). So we can just omit them.
Similarly, we have empty tags; we can keep them as because they are not forbidden. But maybe we should convert them to as well? The rule only says use for section headers, but these are empty, so we can keep them as is.
Now let's construct the cleaned HTML.
We'll go through the original and produce a sequence of tags.
I'll rewrite step by step, preserving text.
Original first lines:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
We need to output Let's Write Africa''s Story Together!
(since we remove span and class). The inner text includes the ' entities; we keep them as is. So output: Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Next:
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Output: Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Then three empty lines. We'll output three times.
Then:
Job Description
We need to output Job Description
(since it's a section header). The original had around it, but we can just output the text without . So Job Description
Then two empty lines:
Then a paragraph with text: "To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations."
That's a paragraph with no tags. So we output To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations.
Then two more empty
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
My Job Concierge
Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Almost there
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
ECHO
Your MJC Assistant
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.
, no CSS classes, no inline styles. Must preserve all original content word-for-word, not add, remove, summarize, or rephrase. Must use
for section headers like Responsibilities, Qualifications, etc. The original uses tags and other markup. We need to convert to appropriate tags. We must keep all content exactly as is, word-for-word. That includes the weird
Skills
etc. But we cannot use tags? The rule says use for section headers, and - for list items. It doesn't forbid inside paragraphs? It says use
for introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers, - for list items. It doesn't forbid inside paragraphs, but maybe we should keep the original formatting? The instruction: "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". That includes the tags? The original includes tags and other HTML. But the rule says use
for paragraphs and
for section headers. It doesn't say we cannot keep inside. However we might need to convert to something? The rule didn't forbid . It just says use for section headers. So we can keep inside paragraphs. But we must not add any new tags beyond allowed ones? It says no CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags. It doesn't forbid , , etc. So we can keep them.
We need to structure the HTML: Use for section headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also maybe "The Old Mutual Story!" etc.
We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That includes the stray
etc. We need to output only the cleaned HTML, no extra commentary.
We need to convert the given raw text into semantic HTML using allowed tags. Let's parse the content.
The raw text includes:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
To provide comprehensive end-user support ... (some paragraphs)
Key Responsibilities:
EUC Support:
- Provide first-line and second-line IT support to end-users
...
- Install, configure and maintain laptops, desktops and mobile devices
...
...
- Support live events, presentations, webinars and boardroom meetings
Audio Visual (AV) Support:
... items ...
Minimum Requirements:
...
Technical Skills:
...
Soft Skills:
...
Skills
Competencies
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively...
... many items ...
Education
Bachelor of Commerce (BCom): Information Technology (Required)
Closing Date
30 July 2026 , 23:59
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
We need to output only HTML using ,
, - . No , no
, no inline styles, no classes. But the original has many empty paragraphs. We can keep them as empty maybe? They are empty, but we can keep them as (still a paragraph). That's allowed.
We need to use for section headers. The original uses for headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities:", "EUC Support:", "Audio Visual (AV) Support:", "Minimum Requirements:", "Technical Skills:", "Soft Skills:", "Working Conditions:", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also there are tags in the "Competencies" list: they have empty. We need to preserve them? The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word. So we must keep those tags as they appear. But we are limited to using for section headers. However those are part of the content; we cannot remove them. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't forbid other heading tags, but we might need to keep them as they are. However the rule says "Use for section headers". It might be interpreted that we should use for those headers, not . But we must preserve original content word-for-word, which includes tags. If we replace them with , we would be altering content (changing tag). That would be removing or altering. So we must keep them as they are. But the rule also says "Use for section headers". Possibly we can wrap the header text inside but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
Job Description
etc. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". Those are sections, but the original doesn't have explicit headings with those words; they are bolded text within paragraphs. We could wrap the bolded text in tags? That would add tags not present originally, which would be adding content, violating preservation. So we must not add new tags. So we should keep the original markup as is, but we are only allowed to use
,
, - . However we can still use inside
. The rule didn't forbid . So we can keep tags. But we cannot use or inline styles. The original has many etc. Those have inline style attributes; we must remove them because we cannot have inline styles. So we need to strip style attributes. Also we need to remove class attributes. So we need to output
without style or class. Also remove etc? The rule says no CSS classes, no inline styles. So we can keep as long as it has no class? It has class="emphasis-2". That's a class, which is not allowed. So we must remove the class attribute. Also we must remove style attributes. So we need to output cleaned tags without attributes.
Thus we need to transform the raw HTML into a cleaned version using only allowed tags, but preserving content word-for-word (including the text inside tags). We can remove attributes but keep the inner text. That is allowed because we are not adding or removing words.
We must also preserve empty tags like , , . Those are empty; we can keep them.
We must not add any new text.
Thus the output will be a series of tags with the same inner text as original, but stripped of style and class attributes, and using only ,
, - . However we have
tags that are not allowed? The rule didn't forbid , but it said use for section headers. It didn't forbid other heading tags, but we might want to keep them as they appear. However the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading tags. It just suggests using for those sections. But we have no explicit section headers in the original; they are bolded. So we could just keep them as
...
. That would be okay.
But we need to use for section headers. Which sections are those? Possibly "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". These are section headers. The original uses around them, but we could wrap them in tags to satisfy the rule. However that would be adding tags around content that originally didn't have them, which is adding new markup, but not adding new text. The rule says "Use for section headers". It doesn't say we cannot wrap the existing bolded text in . That would be adding a tag but not altering text. Is that allowed? The rule says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. The instruction is about content, not markup? It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". That likely refers to the textual content, not the HTML tags. So we can add tags as needed, as long as we don't change the text. So we can wrap the bolded headings in tags. That would be adding ...
around the existing .... That would change the tag structure but not the text. Is that considered "adding"? It adds a tag, but not new text. The instruction might consider that as adding markup, which might be disallowed. However the rule explicitly says "Use for section headers". So we must use for those sections. Therefore we need to convert the headings to . The original headings are bolded text within
. We can replace the
...
with ...
(removing and maybe). But that would be removing tags and
tags, which is removing markup but not text. The instruction says "do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Removing tags might be considered removing markup, but not text. However it might be considered "removing" something from the content (the tags). But the instruction likely refers to content, not markup. It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". So we must keep the same words, but we can change tags? It's ambiguous. Safer approach: Keep the original tags exactly as they appear, but we need to use for section headers. The original doesn't have tags, but we can add them around the heading text, but that would be adding new tags, which might be considered adding content? The instruction says "do not add ... or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. I think it's permissible because the rule about using for section headers is explicit, so we must use for those headings. So we will wrap the heading text (the bolded text) in tags, and remove the surrounding
and maybe? But we must preserve the text word-for-word, which includes the bold markup? The bold markup is not visible text. The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word, not markup. So we can change tags as needed as long as the visible text remains same. So we can convert
Job Description
to Job Description
. That would preserve the text "Job Description". That seems okay.
Thus we will produce HTML where section headings are wrapped in . For list items, we will use - ...
. For other paragraphs, we will use
...
.
We must remove any style attributes and class attributes. Also remove any empty maybe keep as but we cannot use because it's forbidden. So we must remove tags entirely. The rule says no s. So we must not output tags. So we need to remove them, but we must preserve the content inside them (which is empty). So we can just omit them.
Similarly, we have empty tags; we can keep them as because they are not forbidden. But maybe we should convert them to as well? The rule only says use for section headers, but these are empty, so we can keep them as is.
Now let's construct the cleaned HTML.
We'll go through the original and produce a sequence of tags.
I'll rewrite step by step, preserving text.
Original first lines:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
We need to output Let's Write Africa''s Story Together!
(since we remove span and class). The inner text includes the ' entities; we keep them as is. So output: Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Next:
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Output: Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Then three empty lines. We'll output three times.
Then:
Job Description
We need to output Job Description
(since it's a section header). The original had around it, but we can just output the text without . So Job Description
Then two empty lines:
Then a paragraph with text: "To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations."
That's a paragraph with no tags. So we output To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations.
Then two more empty
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
My Job Concierge
Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Almost there
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
ECHO
Your MJC Assistant
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.
for introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers, - for list items. It doesn't forbid inside paragraphs, but maybe we should keep the original formatting? The instruction: "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". That includes the tags? The original includes tags and other HTML. But the rule says use
for paragraphs and
for section headers. It doesn't say we cannot keep inside. However we might need to convert to something? The rule didn't forbid . It just says use for section headers. So we can keep inside paragraphs. But we must not add any new tags beyond allowed ones? It says no CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags. It doesn't forbid , , etc. So we can keep them.
We need to structure the HTML: Use for section headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also maybe "The Old Mutual Story!" etc.
We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That includes the stray
etc. We need to output only the cleaned HTML, no extra commentary.
We need to convert the given raw text into semantic HTML using allowed tags. Let's parse the content.
The raw text includes:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
To provide comprehensive end-user support ... (some paragraphs)
Key Responsibilities:
EUC Support:
- Provide first-line and second-line IT support to end-users
...
- Install, configure and maintain laptops, desktops and mobile devices
...
...
- Support live events, presentations, webinars and boardroom meetings
Audio Visual (AV) Support:
... items ...
Minimum Requirements:
...
Technical Skills:
...
Soft Skills:
...
Skills
Competencies
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively...
... many items ...
Education
Bachelor of Commerce (BCom): Information Technology (Required)
Closing Date
30 July 2026 , 23:59
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
We need to output only HTML using ,
, - . No , no
, no inline styles, no classes. But the original has many empty paragraphs. We can keep them as empty maybe? They are empty, but we can keep them as (still a paragraph). That's allowed.
We need to use for section headers. The original uses for headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities:", "EUC Support:", "Audio Visual (AV) Support:", "Minimum Requirements:", "Technical Skills:", "Soft Skills:", "Working Conditions:", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also there are tags in the "Competencies" list: they have empty. We need to preserve them? The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word. So we must keep those tags as they appear. But we are limited to using for section headers. However those are part of the content; we cannot remove them. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't forbid other heading tags, but we might need to keep them as they are. However the rule says "Use for section headers". It might be interpreted that we should use for those headers, not . But we must preserve original content word-for-word, which includes tags. If we replace them with , we would be altering content (changing tag). That would be removing or altering. So we must keep them as they are. But the rule also says "Use for section headers". Possibly we can wrap the header text inside but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
Job Description
etc. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". Those are sections, but the original doesn't have explicit headings with those words; they are bolded text within paragraphs. We could wrap the bolded text in tags? That would add tags not present originally, which would be adding content, violating preservation. So we must not add new tags. So we should keep the original markup as is, but we are only allowed to use
,
, - . However we can still use inside
. The rule didn't forbid . So we can keep tags. But we cannot use or inline styles. The original has many etc. Those have inline style attributes; we must remove them because we cannot have inline styles. So we need to strip style attributes. Also we need to remove class attributes. So we need to output
without style or class. Also remove etc? The rule says no CSS classes, no inline styles. So we can keep as long as it has no class? It has class="emphasis-2". That's a class, which is not allowed. So we must remove the class attribute. Also we must remove style attributes. So we need to output cleaned tags without attributes.
Thus we need to transform the raw HTML into a cleaned version using only allowed tags, but preserving content word-for-word (including the text inside tags). We can remove attributes but keep the inner text. That is allowed because we are not adding or removing words.
We must also preserve empty tags like , , . Those are empty; we can keep them.
We must not add any new text.
Thus the output will be a series of tags with the same inner text as original, but stripped of style and class attributes, and using only ,
, - . However we have
tags that are not allowed? The rule didn't forbid , but it said use for section headers. It didn't forbid other heading tags, but we might want to keep them as they appear. However the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading tags. It just suggests using for those sections. But we have no explicit section headers in the original; they are bolded. So we could just keep them as
...
. That would be okay.
But we need to use for section headers. Which sections are those? Possibly "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". These are section headers. The original uses around them, but we could wrap them in tags to satisfy the rule. However that would be adding tags around content that originally didn't have them, which is adding new markup, but not adding new text. The rule says "Use for section headers". It doesn't say we cannot wrap the existing bolded text in . That would be adding a tag but not altering text. Is that allowed? The rule says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. The instruction is about content, not markup? It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". That likely refers to the textual content, not the HTML tags. So we can add tags as needed, as long as we don't change the text. So we can wrap the bolded headings in tags. That would be adding ...
around the existing .... That would change the tag structure but not the text. Is that considered "adding"? It adds a tag, but not new text. The instruction might consider that as adding markup, which might be disallowed. However the rule explicitly says "Use for section headers". So we must use for those sections. Therefore we need to convert the headings to . The original headings are bolded text within
. We can replace the
...
with ...
(removing and maybe). But that would be removing tags and
tags, which is removing markup but not text. The instruction says "do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Removing tags might be considered removing markup, but not text. However it might be considered "removing" something from the content (the tags). But the instruction likely refers to content, not markup. It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". So we must keep the same words, but we can change tags? It's ambiguous. Safer approach: Keep the original tags exactly as they appear, but we need to use for section headers. The original doesn't have tags, but we can add them around the heading text, but that would be adding new tags, which might be considered adding content? The instruction says "do not add ... or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. I think it's permissible because the rule about using for section headers is explicit, so we must use for those headings. So we will wrap the heading text (the bolded text) in tags, and remove the surrounding
and maybe? But we must preserve the text word-for-word, which includes the bold markup? The bold markup is not visible text. The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word, not markup. So we can change tags as needed as long as the visible text remains same. So we can convert
Job Description
to Job Description
. That would preserve the text "Job Description". That seems okay.
Thus we will produce HTML where section headings are wrapped in . For list items, we will use - ...
. For other paragraphs, we will use
...
.
We must remove any style attributes and class attributes. Also remove any empty maybe keep as but we cannot use because it's forbidden. So we must remove tags entirely. The rule says no s. So we must not output tags. So we need to remove them, but we must preserve the content inside them (which is empty). So we can just omit them.
Similarly, we have empty tags; we can keep them as because they are not forbidden. But maybe we should convert them to as well? The rule only says use for section headers, but these are empty, so we can keep them as is.
Now let's construct the cleaned HTML.
We'll go through the original and produce a sequence of tags.
I'll rewrite step by step, preserving text.
Original first lines:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
We need to output Let's Write Africa''s Story Together!
(since we remove span and class). The inner text includes the ' entities; we keep them as is. So output: Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Next:
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Output: Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Then three empty lines. We'll output three times.
Then:
Job Description
We need to output Job Description
(since it's a section header). The original had around it, but we can just output the text without . So Job Description
Then two empty lines:
Then a paragraph with text: "To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations."
That's a paragraph with no tags. So we output To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations.
Then two more empty
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
My Job Concierge
Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Almost there
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
ECHO
Your MJC Assistant
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.
for paragraphs and
for section headers. It doesn't say we cannot keep inside. However we might need to convert to something? The rule didn't forbid . It just says use for section headers. So we can keep inside paragraphs. But we must not add any new tags beyond allowed ones? It says no CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags. It doesn't forbid , , etc. So we can keep them.
We need to structure the HTML: Use for section headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also maybe "The Old Mutual Story!" etc.
We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That includes the stray
etc. We need to output only the cleaned HTML, no extra commentary.
We need to convert the given raw text into semantic HTML using allowed tags. Let's parse the content.
The raw text includes:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
To provide comprehensive end-user support ... (some paragraphs)
Key Responsibilities:
EUC Support:
- Provide first-line and second-line IT support to end-users
...
- Install, configure and maintain laptops, desktops and mobile devices
...
...
- Support live events, presentations, webinars and boardroom meetings
Audio Visual (AV) Support:
... items ...
Minimum Requirements:
...
Technical Skills:
...
Soft Skills:
...
Skills
Competencies
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively...
... many items ...
Education
Bachelor of Commerce (BCom): Information Technology (Required)
Closing Date
30 July 2026 , 23:59
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
We need to output only HTML using ,
, - . No , no
, no inline styles, no classes. But the original has many empty paragraphs. We can keep them as empty maybe? They are empty, but we can keep them as (still a paragraph). That's allowed.
We need to use for section headers. The original uses for headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities:", "EUC Support:", "Audio Visual (AV) Support:", "Minimum Requirements:", "Technical Skills:", "Soft Skills:", "Working Conditions:", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also there are tags in the "Competencies" list: they have empty. We need to preserve them? The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word. So we must keep those tags as they appear. But we are limited to using for section headers. However those are part of the content; we cannot remove them. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't forbid other heading tags, but we might need to keep them as they are. However the rule says "Use for section headers". It might be interpreted that we should use for those headers, not . But we must preserve original content word-for-word, which includes tags. If we replace them with , we would be altering content (changing tag). That would be removing or altering. So we must keep them as they are. But the rule also says "Use for section headers". Possibly we can wrap the header text inside but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
Job Description
etc. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". Those are sections, but the original doesn't have explicit headings with those words; they are bolded text within paragraphs. We could wrap the bolded text in tags? That would add tags not present originally, which would be adding content, violating preservation. So we must not add new tags. So we should keep the original markup as is, but we are only allowed to use
,
, - . However we can still use inside
. The rule didn't forbid . So we can keep tags. But we cannot use or inline styles. The original has many etc. Those have inline style attributes; we must remove them because we cannot have inline styles. So we need to strip style attributes. Also we need to remove class attributes. So we need to output
without style or class. Also remove etc? The rule says no CSS classes, no inline styles. So we can keep as long as it has no class? It has class="emphasis-2". That's a class, which is not allowed. So we must remove the class attribute. Also we must remove style attributes. So we need to output cleaned tags without attributes.
Thus we need to transform the raw HTML into a cleaned version using only allowed tags, but preserving content word-for-word (including the text inside tags). We can remove attributes but keep the inner text. That is allowed because we are not adding or removing words.
We must also preserve empty tags like , , . Those are empty; we can keep them.
We must not add any new text.
Thus the output will be a series of tags with the same inner text as original, but stripped of style and class attributes, and using only ,
, - . However we have
tags that are not allowed? The rule didn't forbid , but it said use for section headers. It didn't forbid other heading tags, but we might want to keep them as they appear. However the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading tags. It just suggests using for those sections. But we have no explicit section headers in the original; they are bolded. So we could just keep them as
...
. That would be okay.
But we need to use for section headers. Which sections are those? Possibly "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". These are section headers. The original uses around them, but we could wrap them in tags to satisfy the rule. However that would be adding tags around content that originally didn't have them, which is adding new markup, but not adding new text. The rule says "Use for section headers". It doesn't say we cannot wrap the existing bolded text in . That would be adding a tag but not altering text. Is that allowed? The rule says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. The instruction is about content, not markup? It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". That likely refers to the textual content, not the HTML tags. So we can add tags as needed, as long as we don't change the text. So we can wrap the bolded headings in tags. That would be adding ...
around the existing .... That would change the tag structure but not the text. Is that considered "adding"? It adds a tag, but not new text. The instruction might consider that as adding markup, which might be disallowed. However the rule explicitly says "Use for section headers". So we must use for those sections. Therefore we need to convert the headings to . The original headings are bolded text within
. We can replace the
...
with ...
(removing and maybe). But that would be removing tags and
tags, which is removing markup but not text. The instruction says "do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Removing tags might be considered removing markup, but not text. However it might be considered "removing" something from the content (the tags). But the instruction likely refers to content, not markup. It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". So we must keep the same words, but we can change tags? It's ambiguous. Safer approach: Keep the original tags exactly as they appear, but we need to use for section headers. The original doesn't have tags, but we can add them around the heading text, but that would be adding new tags, which might be considered adding content? The instruction says "do not add ... or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. I think it's permissible because the rule about using for section headers is explicit, so we must use for those headings. So we will wrap the heading text (the bolded text) in tags, and remove the surrounding
and maybe? But we must preserve the text word-for-word, which includes the bold markup? The bold markup is not visible text. The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word, not markup. So we can change tags as needed as long as the visible text remains same. So we can convert
Job Description
to Job Description
. That would preserve the text "Job Description". That seems okay.
Thus we will produce HTML where section headings are wrapped in . For list items, we will use - ...
. For other paragraphs, we will use
...
.
We must remove any style attributes and class attributes. Also remove any empty maybe keep as but we cannot use because it's forbidden. So we must remove tags entirely. The rule says no s. So we must not output tags. So we need to remove them, but we must preserve the content inside them (which is empty). So we can just omit them.
Similarly, we have empty tags; we can keep them as because they are not forbidden. But maybe we should convert them to as well? The rule only says use for section headers, but these are empty, so we can keep them as is.
Now let's construct the cleaned HTML.
We'll go through the original and produce a sequence of tags.
I'll rewrite step by step, preserving text.
Original first lines:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
We need to output Let's Write Africa''s Story Together!
(since we remove span and class). The inner text includes the ' entities; we keep them as is. So output: Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Next:
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Output: Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Then three empty lines. We'll output three times.
Then:
Job Description
We need to output Job Description
(since it's a section header). The original had around it, but we can just output the text without . So Job Description
Then two empty lines:
Then a paragraph with text: "To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations."
That's a paragraph with no tags. So we output To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations.
Then two more empty
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
My Job Concierge
Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Almost there
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
ECHO
Your MJC Assistant
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.
tags. It doesn't forbid , , etc. So we can keep them. We need to structure the HTML: Use
for section headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also maybe "The Old Mutual Story!" etc. We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That includes the stray
etc. We need to output only the cleaned HTML, no extra commentary. We need to convert the given raw text into semantic HTML using allowed tags. Let's parse the content. The raw text includes:Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Job Description
To provide comprehensive end-user support ... (some paragraphs)Key Responsibilities:
EUC Support:
- Provide first-line and second-line IT support to end-users ...
- Install, configure and maintain laptops, desktops and mobile devices ... ...
- Support live events, presentations, webinars and boardroom meetings
Audio Visual (AV) Support:
- ... items ...
Minimum Requirements:
- ...
Technical Skills:
- ...
Soft Skills:
- ...
Skills
Competencies
Collaborates Communicates Effectively... ... manyitems ...
Education
Bachelor of Commerce (BCom): Information Technology (Required)Closing Date
30 July 2026 , 23:59The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
We need to output only HTML using,
, - . No , no
, no inline styles, no classes. But the original has many empty paragraphs. We can keep them as empty maybe? They are empty, but we can keep them as (still a paragraph). That's allowed.
We need to use for section headers. The original uses for headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities:", "EUC Support:", "Audio Visual (AV) Support:", "Minimum Requirements:", "Technical Skills:", "Soft Skills:", "Working Conditions:", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also there are tags in the "Competencies" list: they have empty. We need to preserve them? The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word. So we must keep those tags as they appear. But we are limited to using for section headers. However those are part of the content; we cannot remove them. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't forbid other heading tags, but we might need to keep them as they are. However the rule says "Use for section headers". It might be interpreted that we should use for those headers, not . But we must preserve original content word-for-word, which includes tags. If we replace them with , we would be altering content (changing tag). That would be removing or altering. So we must keep them as they are. But the rule also says "Use for section headers". Possibly we can wrap the header text inside but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
Job Description
etc. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". Those are sections, but the original doesn't have explicit headings with those words; they are bolded text within paragraphs. We could wrap the bolded text in tags? That would add tags not present originally, which would be adding content, violating preservation. So we must not add new tags. So we should keep the original markup as is, but we are only allowed to use
,
, - . However we can still use inside
. The rule didn't forbid . So we can keep tags. But we cannot use or inline styles. The original has many etc. Those have inline style attributes; we must remove them because we cannot have inline styles. So we need to strip style attributes. Also we need to remove class attributes. So we need to output
without style or class. Also remove etc? The rule says no CSS classes, no inline styles. So we can keep as long as it has no class? It has class="emphasis-2". That's a class, which is not allowed. So we must remove the class attribute. Also we must remove style attributes. So we need to output cleaned tags without attributes.
Thus we need to transform the raw HTML into a cleaned version using only allowed tags, but preserving content word-for-word (including the text inside tags). We can remove attributes but keep the inner text. That is allowed because we are not adding or removing words.
We must also preserve empty tags like , , . Those are empty; we can keep them.
We must not add any new text.
Thus the output will be a series of tags with the same inner text as original, but stripped of style and class attributes, and using only ,
, - . However we have
tags that are not allowed? The rule didn't forbid , but it said use for section headers. It didn't forbid other heading tags, but we might want to keep them as they appear. However the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading tags. It just suggests using for those sections. But we have no explicit section headers in the original; they are bolded. So we could just keep them as
...
. That would be okay.
But we need to use for section headers. Which sections are those? Possibly "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". These are section headers. The original uses around them, but we could wrap them in tags to satisfy the rule. However that would be adding tags around content that originally didn't have them, which is adding new markup, but not adding new text. The rule says "Use for section headers". It doesn't say we cannot wrap the existing bolded text in . That would be adding a tag but not altering text. Is that allowed? The rule says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. The instruction is about content, not markup? It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". That likely refers to the textual content, not the HTML tags. So we can add tags as needed, as long as we don't change the text. So we can wrap the bolded headings in tags. That would be adding ...
around the existing .... That would change the tag structure but not the text. Is that considered "adding"? It adds a tag, but not new text. The instruction might consider that as adding markup, which might be disallowed. However the rule explicitly says "Use for section headers". So we must use for those sections. Therefore we need to convert the headings to . The original headings are bolded text within
. We can replace the
...
with ...
(removing and maybe). But that would be removing tags and
tags, which is removing markup but not text. The instruction says "do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Removing tags might be considered removing markup, but not text. However it might be considered "removing" something from the content (the tags). But the instruction likely refers to content, not markup. It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". So we must keep the same words, but we can change tags? It's ambiguous. Safer approach: Keep the original tags exactly as they appear, but we need to use for section headers. The original doesn't have tags, but we can add them around the heading text, but that would be adding new tags, which might be considered adding content? The instruction says "do not add ... or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. I think it's permissible because the rule about using for section headers is explicit, so we must use for those headings. So we will wrap the heading text (the bolded text) in tags, and remove the surrounding
and maybe? But we must preserve the text word-for-word, which includes the bold markup? The bold markup is not visible text. The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word, not markup. So we can change tags as needed as long as the visible text remains same. So we can convert
Job Description
to Job Description
. That would preserve the text "Job Description". That seems okay.
Thus we will produce HTML where section headings are wrapped in . For list items, we will use - ...
. For other paragraphs, we will use
...
.
We must remove any style attributes and class attributes. Also remove any empty maybe keep as but we cannot use because it's forbidden. So we must remove tags entirely. The rule says no s. So we must not output tags. So we need to remove them, but we must preserve the content inside them (which is empty). So we can just omit them.
Similarly, we have empty tags; we can keep them as because they are not forbidden. But maybe we should convert them to as well? The rule only says use for section headers, but these are empty, so we can keep them as is.
Now let's construct the cleaned HTML.
We'll go through the original and produce a sequence of tags.
I'll rewrite step by step, preserving text.
Original first lines:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
We need to output Let's Write Africa''s Story Together!
(since we remove span and class). The inner text includes the ' entities; we keep them as is. So output: Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Next:
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Output: Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Then three empty lines. We'll output three times.
Then:
Job Description
We need to output Job Description
(since it's a section header). The original had around it, but we can just output the text without . So Job Description
Then two empty lines:
Then a paragraph with text: "To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations."
That's a paragraph with no tags. So we output To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations.
Then two more empty
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
My Job Concierge
Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Almost there
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
ECHO
Your MJC Assistant
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.
, no inline styles, no classes. But the original has many empty paragraphs. We can keep them as empty maybe? They are empty, but we can keep them as (still a paragraph). That's allowed. We need to use
for section headers. The original uses for headers like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities:", "EUC Support:", "Audio Visual (AV) Support:", "Minimum Requirements:", "Technical Skills:", "Soft Skills:", "Working Conditions:", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also there are tags in the "Competencies" list: they have empty. We need to preserve them? The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word. So we must keep those tags as they appear. But we are limited to using for section headers. However those are part of the content; we cannot remove them. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't forbid other heading tags, but we might need to keep them as they are. However the rule says "Use for section headers". It might be interpreted that we should use for those headers, not . But we must preserve original content word-for-word, which includes tags. If we replace them with , we would be altering content (changing tag). That would be removing or altering. So we must keep them as they are. But the rule also says "Use for section headers". Possibly we can wrap the header text inside but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
for section headers. However those are part of the content; we cannot remove them. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't forbid other heading tags, but we might need to keep them as they are. However the rule says "Use for section headers". It might be interpreted that we should use for those headers, not . But we must preserve original content word-for-word, which includes tags. If we replace them with , we would be altering content (changing tag). That would be removing or altering. So we must keep them as they are. But the rule also says "Use for section headers". Possibly we can wrap the header text inside but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't forbid other heading tags, but we might need to keep them as they are. However the rule says "Use for section headers". It might be interpreted that we should use for those headers, not . But we must preserve original content word-for-word, which includes tags. If we replace them with , we would be altering content (changing tag). That would be removing or altering. So we must keep them as they are. But the rule also says "Use for section headers". Possibly we can wrap the header text inside but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
for those headers, not . But we must preserve original content word-for-word, which includes tags. If we replace them with , we would be altering content (changing tag). That would be removing or altering. So we must keep them as they are. But the rule also says "Use for section headers". Possibly we can wrap the header text inside but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
, we would be altering content (changing tag). That would be removing or altering. So we must keep them as they are. But the rule also says "Use for section headers". Possibly we can wrap the header text inside but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
but the original uses . This is contradictory. However the instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". So we cannot change to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
to . We must keep them exactly as they appear. So we will keep tags as they are. The rule about using for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
for section headers may be a suggestion but not a strict requirement if we must preserve content. However we might need to use for headings like "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", etc. But the original uses tags, not heading tags. So we can just keep them as
Job Description
etc. But the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". Those are sections, but the original doesn't have explicit headings with those words; they are bolded text within paragraphs. We could wrap the bolded text in tags? That would add tags not present originally, which would be adding content, violating preservation. So we must not add new tags. So we should keep the original markup as is, but we are only allowed to use
,
, - . However we can still use inside
. The rule didn't forbid . So we can keep tags. But we cannot use or inline styles. The original has many etc. Those have inline style attributes; we must remove them because we cannot have inline styles. So we need to strip style attributes. Also we need to remove class attributes. So we need to output
without style or class. Also remove etc? The rule says no CSS classes, no inline styles. So we can keep as long as it has no class? It has class="emphasis-2". That's a class, which is not allowed. So we must remove the class attribute. Also we must remove style attributes. So we need to output cleaned tags without attributes.
Thus we need to transform the raw HTML into a cleaned version using only allowed tags, but preserving content word-for-word (including the text inside tags). We can remove attributes but keep the inner text. That is allowed because we are not adding or removing words.
We must also preserve empty tags like , , . Those are empty; we can keep them.
We must not add any new text.
Thus the output will be a series of tags with the same inner text as original, but stripped of style and class attributes, and using only ,
, - . However we have
tags that are not allowed? The rule didn't forbid , but it said use for section headers. It didn't forbid other heading tags, but we might want to keep them as they appear. However the rule says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading tags. It just suggests using for those sections. But we have no explicit section headers in the original; they are bolded. So we could just keep them as
...
. That would be okay.
But we need to use for section headers. Which sections are those? Possibly "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". These are section headers. The original uses around them, but we could wrap them in tags to satisfy the rule. However that would be adding tags around content that originally didn't have them, which is adding new markup, but not adding new text. The rule says "Use for section headers". It doesn't say we cannot wrap the existing bolded text in . That would be adding a tag but not altering text. Is that allowed? The rule says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. The instruction is about content, not markup? It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". That likely refers to the textual content, not the HTML tags. So we can add tags as needed, as long as we don't change the text. So we can wrap the bolded headings in tags. That would be adding ...
around the existing .... That would change the tag structure but not the text. Is that considered "adding"? It adds a tag, but not new text. The instruction might consider that as adding markup, which might be disallowed. However the rule explicitly says "Use for section headers". So we must use for those sections. Therefore we need to convert the headings to . The original headings are bolded text within
. We can replace the
...
with ...
(removing and maybe). But that would be removing tags and
tags, which is removing markup but not text. The instruction says "do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Removing tags might be considered removing markup, but not text. However it might be considered "removing" something from the content (the tags). But the instruction likely refers to content, not markup. It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". So we must keep the same words, but we can change tags? It's ambiguous. Safer approach: Keep the original tags exactly as they appear, but we need to use for section headers. The original doesn't have tags, but we can add them around the heading text, but that would be adding new tags, which might be considered adding content? The instruction says "do not add ... or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. I think it's permissible because the rule about using for section headers is explicit, so we must use for those headings. So we will wrap the heading text (the bolded text) in tags, and remove the surrounding
and maybe? But we must preserve the text word-for-word, which includes the bold markup? The bold markup is not visible text. The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word, not markup. So we can change tags as needed as long as the visible text remains same. So we can convert
Job Description
to Job Description
. That would preserve the text "Job Description". That seems okay.
Thus we will produce HTML where section headings are wrapped in . For list items, we will use - ...
. For other paragraphs, we will use
...
.
We must remove any style attributes and class attributes. Also remove any empty maybe keep as but we cannot use because it's forbidden. So we must remove tags entirely. The rule says no s. So we must not output tags. So we need to remove them, but we must preserve the content inside them (which is empty). So we can just omit them.
Similarly, we have empty tags; we can keep them as because they are not forbidden. But maybe we should convert them to as well? The rule only says use for section headers, but these are empty, so we can keep them as is.
Now let's construct the cleaned HTML.
We'll go through the original and produce a sequence of tags.
I'll rewrite step by step, preserving text.
Original first lines:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
We need to output Let's Write Africa''s Story Together!
(since we remove span and class). The inner text includes the ' entities; we keep them as is. So output: Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Next:
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Output: Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Then three empty lines. We'll output three times.
Then:
Job Description
We need to output Job Description
(since it's a section header). The original had around it, but we can just output the text without . So Job Description
Then two empty lines:
Then a paragraph with text: "To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations."
That's a paragraph with no tags. So we output To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations.
Then two more empty
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
. The rule didn't forbid . So we can keep tags. But we cannot use etc. Those have inline style attributes; we must remove them because we cannot have inline styles. So we need to strip style attributes. Also we need to remove class attributes. So we need to output without style or class. Also remove etc? The rule says no CSS classes, no inline styles. So we can keep as long as it has no class? It has class="emphasis-2". That's a class, which is not allowed. So we must remove the class attribute. Also we must remove style attributes. So we need to output cleaned tags without attributes.
Thus we need to transform the raw HTML into a cleaned version using only allowed tags, but preserving content word-for-word (including the text inside tags). We can remove attributes but keep the inner text. That is allowed because we are not adding or removing words.
We must also preserve empty tags like , , . Those are empty; we can keep them.
We must not add any new text.
Thus the output will be a series of tags with the same inner text as original, but stripped of style and class attributes, and using only , ... . We can replace the ... maybe). But that would be removing tags and tags, which is removing markup but not text. The instruction says "do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Removing tags might be considered removing markup, but not text. However it might be considered "removing" something from the content (the tags). But the instruction likely refers to content, not markup. It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". So we must keep the same words, but we can change tags? It's ambiguous. Safer approach: Keep the original tags exactly as they appear, but we need to use and maybe? But we must preserve the text word-for-word, which includes the bold markup? The bold markup is not visible text. The instruction says preserve all original content word-for-word, not markup. So we can change tags as needed as long as the visible text remains same. So we can convert Job Description ... Let's Write Africa's Story Together! Let's Write Africa''s Story Together! Let's Write Africa's Story Together! Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this. Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this. Job Description To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations. Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes. The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.,
tags that are not allowed? The rule didn't forbid
, but it said use
for section headers. It didn't forbid other heading tags, but we might want to keep them as they appear. However the rule says "Use
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other heading tags. It just suggests using
for those sections. But we have no explicit section headers in the original; they are bolded. So we could just keep them as
for section headers. Which sections are those? Possibly "Job Description", "Key Responsibilities", "EUC Support", "Audio Visual (AV) Support", "Minimum Requirements", "Technical Skills", "Soft Skills", "Working Conditions", "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". These are section headers. The original uses around them, but we could wrap them in
tags to satisfy the rule. However that would be adding
tags around content that originally didn't have them, which is adding new markup, but not adding new text. The rule says "Use
for section headers". It doesn't say we cannot wrap the existing bolded text in
. That would be adding a tag but not altering text. Is that allowed? The rule says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. The instruction is about content, not markup? It says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word". That likely refers to the textual content, not the HTML tags. So we can add tags as needed, as long as we don't change the text. So we can wrap the bolded headings in
tags. That would be adding
...
around the existing .... That would change the tag structure but not the text. Is that considered "adding"? It adds a tag, but not new text. The instruction might consider that as adding markup, which might be disallowed. However the rule explicitly says "Use for section headers". So we must use
for those sections. Therefore we need to convert the headings to
. The original headings are bolded text within
...
(removing and for section headers. The original doesn't have
tags, but we can add them around the heading text, but that would be adding new tags, which might be considered adding content? The instruction says "do not add ... or rephrase". Adding a tag is not adding text, but it's adding markup. I think it's permissible because the rule about using
for section headers is explicit, so we must use
for those headings. So we will wrap the heading text (the bolded text) in
tags, and remove the surrounding
Job Description
. That would preserve the text "Job Description". That seems okay.
Thus we will produce HTML where section headings are wrapped in . For list items, we will use
. For other paragraphs, we will use as well? The rule only says use
for section headers, but these are empty, so we can keep them as is.
Now let's construct the cleaned HTML.
We'll go through the original and produce a sequence of tags.
I'll rewrite step by step, preserving text.
Original first lines:
Job Description
(since it's a section header). The original had around it, but we can just output the text without . So Job Description
Then two empty lines:
Then a paragraph with text: "To provide comprehensive end-user support by managing I.T hardware, software and audio-visual systems, ensuring seamless operation of user devices, meeting rooms and conferencing technologies, while maintaining IT systems for smooth day-to-day operations."
That's a paragraph with no tags. So we output How well do you match?
Tailor your CV for this role
Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.